Hello,

2017-08-15 16:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@debian.org>:
> Hi Manuel and maintainers of debian-archive-keyring,
>
> On Fri 2015-10-09 13:09:13 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> From DebConf, I got the imporession that we should start to move to
>> gnupg2, and even if not gnupg2 seems perfectly stable nowadays and
>> having to keep both installed seems unnecessary (I have to use v2 for
>> other reasons).
>>
>> This package depends on and recommends gnupg and gpg, so I think that
>> at least gnupg2 and gpgv2 should be added as an option.
>
> As one of the debian maintainers of GnuPG, please *do not* depend on the
> gnupg2 or gpgv2 packages.  For one thing, the gnupg and gpgv packages
> are shipping the modern version of GnuPG these days anyway (2.1.x), and
> the gnupg2 and gpgv2 packages are dummy/transitional packages (with the
> exception of offering a symlinked name for the binaries in question).
>
> For another, i'm not convinced that debian-archive-keyring should
> Recommend: gnupg at all.
>
> I'm not even sure i understand why debian-archive-keyring Depends: gpgv
> -- the package's goal is to provide the archive keyring to enable
> OpenPGP validation, but the package itself doesn't appear to require
> gpgv in any way.  Presumably the packages that need to *do* OpenPGP
> validation will Depend: gpgv (or whatever other OpenPGP validator tool
> they prefer to use).
>
> I recommend moving gpgv to Suggests: and and removing gnupg from the set
> of dependencies entirely.

I am fine with the solutions that you propose.

My main concern when submitting this bug report was that gnupg-v1 was
kept installed in my system due to this package (maybe among others),
and an alternative dependency on -v2 should have worked fine for the
purpose of this package, at the time.

Now, a long time after than and "gnupg"/"gpgv" being based on v2, the
original request doesn't make much sense, so please do whatever you
consider best -- including closing it right away.


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to