On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > What do you think about this patch instead of your proposed patch? > + opt.use_agent = 1;
Sure, that sounds great. > The trouble, of course, is that now the gnupg1 package now effectively > Depends: gpg-agent, which brings with it a bunch of other dependencies, > which has historically caused a lot of grumbling. Is it worthwhile to > pay that price? Since gnupg(2) already depends on gnupg-agent and we don't want to give people a good reason to use gnupg1, I'm hoping it won't be a problem. > I don't want to spend a ton of time on gnupg1 Me either; that's why I filed this bug report so it will just autosync to Ubuntu in the future. :) Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
