On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:02:04PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I had this problem on 2/3 machines I upgraded today. The upgrade that > > worked was from 0.076-6; the other two were from 0.081-1. I donno if > > thats relevant. > I doubt it, both versions use s-d-d --name. > > > I wonder if perhaps the udev daemon was killed by something other than > > s-s-d, > The error message you reported had the s-s-d prefix. > > > or by some earlier part of s-s-d? > I do not know what this means. I meant if udev got killed either before s-s-d was even started, or if s-s-d somehow tried to kill it twice, and failed on the second attempt.
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
