On 27/07/17 14:05, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > It does break the API, as evinced by one build failure. > > I’m not aware of situations in the past where we created a new binary. > How would we name them? Is it worth the trouble?
We had to do it once, for golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-v3-dev Worth the trouble or not: depends on who gets to fix all the breakage left behind :) > Personally, I would just update the new version + the fixed affected > packages in one go, to reduce the breakage to a minimum. I would be OK with that. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
