On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:40:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:29:39PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Raul Miller writes ("Re: #342455"):
> > > I agree that the devmapper default should match other
> > > debian defaults, and vice-versa.> > If I may try to channel Bastian Blank for a moment: > > The proposed change to devmapper changes the permissions for all block > > devices, doesn't it ? Whereas the other debian defaults vary from one > > kind of device to another. For example, floppies are g+w floppy. > So which devmapper devices are people using on which it would be wrong to > grant access to the "disk" group? ... follow-up to self: given that crypt-dm sits on top of devmapper, it is indeed plausible that one would want to prevent members of group disk from reading the decrypted volume. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
