On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:17:46AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:34:43AM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Please reassign to python-popcon. > > > > Well, there are perhaps two bugs here, so simply reassigning won't be > > sufficient: > > > > Firstly, all-popcon-results.txt.gz contains invalid data. I agree that > > the client should not be removed from testing but I could not find a > > suitable pseudo-package for the popcon "web" service. > > > > (The code that generates this file appears to be in the popularity-contest > > source package, hence why I filed it here) > > Bill, following this I have reopened the bug and downgraded the > severity. > > > Where should this issue be raised? I don't care about the severity, more > > that it gets fixed. How can I help? :) > > I also disagree with merely tracking an issue which breaks Debian > infrastrcuture on a mailinglist instead of a proper bug tracker. > > Bill, if you really insist #833695 should not be assigned at > popularity-contest then please reassign it to qa.debian.org > pseudo-package.
Were you saying that the qa.debian.org website is using python-popcon and so was broken because of this ? In that case, yes, it would have been appropriate to report the bug there. In any case, could you deal with this bug, either by closing it or by reassigning it ? Thanks. There is nothing I can do from my side. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
