On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:45:28 -0500 Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Corey Wright writes: > > > i'm not thinking about this so much from an offline justification, but from > > a versioning viewpoint. i'm needing to use beautifulsoup within the > > context of debian stable/"sarge", but the only documentation i have > > (besides the source code and the synthesized help(BeautifulSoup)) is that > > on the website, which is not explicitly applicable to the version in sarge > > (which is a major version different). > > I'm checking to see if this is available. Since this change wouldn't > meet the test for getting into a stable update, I'm not sure it would > help your situation (unless you can upgrade), but perhaps the new 1.x > could be added to a backports repository. i apologize for the misunderstanding... i do not mean for you to address my current situation (lack of documentation in sarge's beautifulsoup), but only mention it as justification for including the documentation in etch's version. i doubt my situation is unique and others may encounter this same problem but in the future after etch is released and beautifulsoup again releases a new major version. thanks for packaging beautifulsoup. corey -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
