On 2017-06-10 13:55, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 18:33 +0200, Julien Aubin wrote: >> Okay thanks. If it were possible in that case to remove the non gnlvd >> it >> could be fine > > Nvidia itself said (or were saying until recently) that the glvnd stuff > was still experimental, so at least for Stretch we should leave the > non-glvnd stuff in. We can consider removing it for Buster IMHO.
We could rename libgl1-nvidia-glx to libgl1-nvidia-non-glvnd-glx (without a transitional package), that would ensure upgrades switch to the glvnd flavor automatically. But I'm not sure whether we should propose to do this in stretch. Same for libegl1. Andreas
