Yuri D'Elia, on mer. 31 mai 2017 12:59:40 +0200, wrote: > My main point was that graphicsmagick/imagemagick is only used for those > filters.
Aaah... imagemagick is currently a Depends. In everything I said I assumed it was a Recommends already, since you mentioned dependencies for braille where downgraded to recommends already, so I thought it was just a question of the alternative. So I'm fine with downgrading to recommends, since I assumed it was already the case :) (and the alternative is fine since you say the compatibility is not perfect graphicsmagick can't Provide a versioned imagemagick) > You could put imagemagick as a recommend as well, but I always find it > confusing if one feature is dependent on *both* recommended packages to > be installed Braille text support does not depend on imagemagick, only braille picture support does. Samuel
