Hello Guillem
>Sure, and the contents for this specific field are probably the only >ones that makes sense applying variable subsitutions for anyway. > >I've fixed this now, and queued a patch for 1.19.x. > >Do you know if there are many such problematic packages in the archive? >If so, given that it's a one-liner fix, I might be tempted to try to >get it merged in 1.18.x… sorry, but I remember I did see some packages with this issue, probably they were less than 10 or so. I don't know how much of the archive is affected! cheers, G.
