Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 confirmed

Hi Ansgar,

Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Severity: serious

I disagree with severity.

> SixXS will shutdown on 2017-06-06[1].

Yes, well-known and already discussed (on IRC IIRC) by us package
maintainers.

> Unless there are other tunnel providers used with aiccu, it seems
> useless to include in stretch.

Yes, but before we decide to pull the line I want to wait until _at
least_ that date (which is next week and not today) and _not_ pull the
line _before_ this date.

Pim van Pelt wrote:
> It may be in our future to opensource the server implementation

Any reason why you can't publish it as is?

> but at that point we can stand up a repo for ourselves.

This comment by Pim makes me even think that we should keeping it in
Stretch. Because why else should upstream keep a Debian package
maintained in an external repo if a suitable server will be available
soon-ish?

> Would you be open to resubmitting in such a scenario?

Sure.

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Reply via email to