Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 confirmed Hi Ansgar,
Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Severity: serious I disagree with severity. > SixXS will shutdown on 2017-06-06[1]. Yes, well-known and already discussed (on IRC IIRC) by us package maintainers. > Unless there are other tunnel providers used with aiccu, it seems > useless to include in stretch. Yes, but before we decide to pull the line I want to wait until _at least_ that date (which is next week and not today) and _not_ pull the line _before_ this date. Pim van Pelt wrote: > It may be in our future to opensource the server implementation Any reason why you can't publish it as is? > but at that point we can stand up a repo for ourselves. This comment by Pim makes me even think that we should keeping it in Stretch. Because why else should upstream keep a Debian package maintained in an external repo if a suitable server will be available soon-ish? > Would you be open to resubmitting in such a scenario? Sure. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE