Control: found -1 4.5.0-1 Control: fixed -1 4.5.1-1 Hi Daniel,
Axel Beckert wrote: > Control: tag -1 + upstream fixed-upstream confirmed > > but if you have any pre-existing code that does something like: > > > > screen -L -c foo.screenrc > > > > then it fails in 4.5.0 because it doesn't like -c as an argument to > > -L. > > Can you check if this is fixed in screen 4.5.1-3 from Debian > Experimental? Because according to the upstream bug report > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50440 this should be fixed in 4.5.1. I just checked with that example and an empty foo.screenrc and I can confirm that this is fixed in Debian Experimental. > If so, I'll try to cherry-pick the according upstream commits. Seem to > be these commits: > > Code change: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/screen.git/commit/?h=screen-v4&id=18193bc7b237d66a076fffa21d4308dbb4f83cc5 Unfortunately this commit doesn't apply to 4.5.0. But I noticed there's an earlier and much smaller commit which explicitly targets the API regression: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/screen.git/commit/?h=screen-v4&id=c14e05e7c36c64d85198ed0fc89177427ece48d4 I'll check if that also suffice. I'd though be happy if you could have a look over this commit and tell me if you also think that this commit is already sufficient. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
