Am 18.05.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Steve Cotton: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:12:52PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> Usertags: unblock >> >> + * Repackaged to remove generated files and copyright violations >> + from the upstream sources. (Closes: #861612) > > Hi Adrian, Markus and the Release Team, > > I'm sorry to be a spoilsport, but I ask the Release Team to review bug > #861612 before unblocking Pixbros, particularly the comparisons in > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861612#30>. > > Please note that both Adrian and Markus Koschany disagree with me.
I still believe I gave you a reasonable explanation in [1] why pixbros is not non-free. You also have not commented on my note that, according to your reasoning, games like Pathological or Tuxpuck would also be affected. I could continue with this list. Did you ever play pacman [2]? You use Policy 2.3 as a justification for your severity. Which concrete law in which country would we break by distributing pixbros? Where is the evidence that distributing the game is harmful for Debian? [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861612#35 [2] https://packages.debian.org/sid/pacman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
