Control: severity -1 important On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:52:09AM +0200, Guillaume Delacour wrote: > Le 15/05/2017 à 00:50, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > So it's a fully _reproducible_ bug, with a well-defined immediate cause > > (even if we haven't identified the indirect cause yet) -- unlike the > > original report by Santiago Villa. Thus, it looks we have two different > > bugs that just happen to trigger the same failure mode. > > > > And thus, even if we fix the schroot issue, Santiago's bug likely won't be > > fixed. > > > >> Now, the next question is: where does this /etc/hosts come from? The file > >> is present in the above form directly after unpacking the schroot tarball, > >> before even entering the schroot. > > As this bug is not related to sslh package itself, i've removed the > pending tag, i let Michael revert > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/sslh.git/commit/?id=243bb3faa682afa8168664eaf5a4f72cfc21ee27 > and closing this bug to disable the autoremoval in testing.
Well, closing is inappropriate, as we have at least _two_ bugs that result in sslh hanging during the testsuite -- this one being deterministic means it clearly is not the cause of random FTBFSes as in the original report. Let's restore the severity then, as the not-yet-known bug happens only some of the time. Meow! -- Don't be racist. White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based solely on their merits. Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a beer's job, why not? On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.
