Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> writes: > Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been > approved by the policy group, that's the idea, and that's enough.
Thanks! > I've already made the upload, but I still have a minor comment: > We have symlinks like GPL -> GPL-3 for some licenses, but not for all > of them. > Because the MPL license itself does not seem to encourage the "or any > later version" wording (as the GPL does), I decided that we can live > without a symlink for the MPL. But if there is a good reason why we > should have it, please let me know. I agree with this decision -- I think we shouldn't have a symlink. I feel like the symlink was mostly there for the "or any later version" semantics (and only arguably useful there), and don't see a need to add it for licenses that don't use that provision. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
