Control: retitle -1 sangs should be no lower than -80, probably -95, not -35
Control: tag -1 pending
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The English dictionary includes the word "sangs". I can't find any
> evidence suggesting that this is a word in English, based on several
> different dictionaries. ("sang" is a word, but not one with a plural
> like that.)
Apparently, sang is the common name for /Panax quinquefolius/, and its
plural is sangs.
However, that's so obscure that it while it's reasonable to be in
-insane or possibly -huge, it definitely should not be in -35 where it
is currently.
https://git.donarmstrong.com/deb_pkgs/scowl.git/c/4d4ec is the fix for it.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
I'm wrong to criticize the valor of your brave men. It's important to
die for one's country when it means being the subject of a king who
wears a ruffled collar or a pleated one.
-- Cyrano de Bergerac
