Hi, On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:39:21PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > > > Hello, i'm working on packaging tuned, currently i'm stuck at one of its > > > new dependencies python-perf which depends on py-statistics (also new > > > package) > > > I plan to keep the packaging in git, using a repo in collab-maint > > > > > > Your help, and anybody else subscribed to this bug, is appreciated :) > > > > is there any progress on this ITP? I would be interested in a package too. > > Actually, I have some half-working git tree at [1]. > > I'm surprised how similar your packaging is to mine :), however you are far > ahead.
:) > I would be happy to co maintain this package with you, we could base > on your repo. However I want to change one thing, as I plan to provide > backports I'd like to have debian/unstable, debian/jessie, debian/stretch, > and so on branches for development instead of just debian branch Sure. I usually have "debian" for unstable and then "debian/jessie", "debian/jessie-backports" etc for the backports, but I would not mind using "debian/sid" or "debian/unstable" for the main development branch. In the end, it's just a name ;) One thing about backports, policykit in jessie provides polkitd.service, while stretch/sid have polkit.service (like upstream) and tuned.service depends on the later. It's a simple patch for jessie, but we'll have to carry it. I'll setup the collab-maint repo and push my stuff there. > > Please note, the python perf package tuned wants is [2] not [3] :/ > > However, it's just one plugin that would have to be skipped. > :( > > Let's disable that plugin for now, until [2] is available Yepp, will do so shortly.
