Hi Luca, Yes, sorry about that, i'll post to the bug report. > You mean, Apache or OpenSSL?
I've had a 2.4.18 apache2 with http2 ( and ssl 1.0.2f) , fully tested. You need to compile apache with openssl 1.0.2f+ libs. So get the debian stretch openssl source, compile that, install the needed packages and then apache. Best regards, Louis van Belle GPG KeyID: EB7A89CF > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Luca Capello [mailto:luca.cape...@infomaniak.com] > Verzonden: dinsdag 11 april 2017 10:59 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > Onderwerp: Re: Bug#860024: apache2-bin: jessie-backports available > > Hi Louis, > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:57:19 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > You missed the update of ssl to 1.0.2f. > > > > > ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1t-1+deb8u6 > > > > You need minimal 1.0.2f+ for ALPN to work and now the option: > SSLOpenSSLConfCmd wont work. > > Thank you for the notice, that is because the debian/control is wrong, > it does not declare such dependency: > > <https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg- > apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/control?h=debian/2.4.25- > 3&id=4f79d48a8a5458eb0186a5a992c73a0699924900#n8> > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20131213~), lsb-release, dpkg-dev (>= > 1.16.1~), > libaprutil1-dev (>= 1.5.0), libapr1-dev (>= 1.5.0), libpcre3-dev, > zlib1g-dev, > libnghttp2-dev, libssl1.0-dev | libssl-dev (<< 1.1), perl, > liblua5.2-dev, libxml2-dev, autotools-dev, gawk | awk, > dh-systemd > > Would you mind posting the same to the BTS, so we can continue in > public? > > > At least thats the last i know, i did this with 2.4.18 already. > > But nobody wanted the upload to BPO. > > You mean, Apache or OpenSSL? > > I would like to avoid to keep backports "hidden", the more we use them > the more we are sure they work correctly. > > Best, > Luca > > -- > Luca Capello > Administrateur GNU/Linux > > Infomaniak Network SA
