2017-04-08 12:49 GMT+02:00 MAROQQO digital media <supp...@maroqqo.com>:
Hi MAROQQO > On 04/08/2017 08:52 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> composite package builds fine and seems to have it's own users ... by >> popcon >> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=composite >> > > To simply say "well, it has its own users" by showing install graphs of > 150 installs is a very simplified point. Yes it is statistic > Sure it has statistically it's "own users". Every available download has > that. Pro audio users tend to test available software by just grabbing it > for a go while they often miss a good overview at first. But it says > nothing about its real usage. Pro audio users often even have no real clue > about the OS they run. Are you joking!!! I am pro_audio user by profession you think that pro_audio users are so silly!!! You can't be serious! > That's why there are so many pro audio multi-packaged bundles around. > Since I have tested the package I can say that this a 100% copy of an old > Hydrogen version without progression. Many new users will not know what > they have here, since there is no explanation about it. It's a lil' bit > like the mess with ffmpeg and libav and the misleading notice while > installation back in the days. The reason for the install statistics even > more prove my worries but do not invalidate them. > I still don't understand what scary you? Having Hydrogen and Composite in archive together is totally harmless. Only reported issue is some "confused Hydrogen users" ( or maybe you? ) ... do you have some numbers how many of them ? Maybe we can add note to Hydrogen manpages "If you want launch Hydrogen double_click Hydrogen icon ... If you want launch Composite double_click Composite icon" Sorry for sarcasm, but really think we are solving here pseudo-problem. :/ mira
