Quoting MAROQQO digital media (2017-04-08 12:49:00) > Since I have tested the package I can say that this a 100% copy of an > old Hydrogen version without progression.
Quite an interesting claim. > To be honest I really wonder about what qualifies a package to be > added to the repositories of Debian, since I used to tend to the > impression, that Debian is very picky about it (one of the reasons I > choose Debian). Please bring up that question at debian-devel mailinglist - this bugreport is the wrong place for that. > On 04/08/2017 08:52 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I am very sorry that some hydrogen users are confused but I > > personally don't think it is reason strong enough to remove > > composite from debian archive > > Well, this is not the only reason if you read my start post and btw > ... it actually is one of the smaller points actually, Please file separate bugreports for each concrete issue: Discussing "the isssue of this package having too many issues" is far easier to do when each issue is tracked individually. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
