Debian BTS administrators <ow...@bugs.debian.org
<mailto:ow...@bugs.debian.org>>
Is that where I should send my recommendation?
On 2017-04-04 03:21, kr...@ftbfs.org wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. Documenting which archive versions are
supported sounds like a good idea.
I think you should report this to the upstream BTS, though, since we
have no control over their website.
--
Matt
On Apr 2, 2017 10:20 AM, David Hedlund <pub...@beloved.name> wrote:
Package: unar
Version: 1.8.1-2
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats says that RAR is fully supported
"Including encryption and multiple volumes. Can also extract .EXE
self-extracting files using RAR."
With my version I could not extract RAR 1.3 and 5.0 archives.
* unar rar50.rar
rar50.rar: Couldn't recognize the archive format.
* unar rar13.rar
rar13.rar: RAR
Archive parsing failed! (File is not fully supported.)
No files extracted.
I got the sample files sent from rarlab.com so they are not corrupt.
#########################
Questions
* Can you please add a new colum, "Revision", in
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats in this order: "Format, Revision,
Support level, Notes"?
* Can you please also state which archives and archive *revisions*
that are supported in each further versions of the package "unar"?
