2017-03-24 1:26 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org>: > > Hi, > > Unfortunately, not everyone wants to use IPv6. For those who don't, > imposing radvd as a hard dependency is a bad idea. IMO, it's best to let > every user choose what it wants to do to match its use case, and > manually install radvd. > > Hi Thomas,
There's no reference about the need to install radvd to configure neutron with IPv6 support in the documentation and IMO is confusing when a configuration option fails because a necessary package is not installed. radvd is a small package with no additional dependencies, so I don't think is bad idea to include it as a dependency. > We could add radvd as Suggests: though, but that is too late to ask for > a migration exception, so this change wont be in Stretch. > > Yes, I agree with you, it's too late for Stretch but maybe it could be included in the next release. Regards, Alberto
