On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: >> >> a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) >> b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) >> >> Forcing the upgrade of only one of the two will fail. > > if this is the case, then I think the packages metadata *must* express this, > probably by depending on the appropriate udev/systemd versions. > > you cannot expect users to do the right thing by themselves ;-)
There cannot be a dependency, as systemd can be used without udev (like on containers), and udev can be used without systemd. Since there are already Breaks/Replaces, and we can't add Depends, what do you think should be done? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
