* Norbert Tretkowski [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 07:35:18 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Hi Nobse,
> > I asked upstream about your bug, and this was his answer:
> > > Are you sure the header cache was being used? The version was bumped
> > > so mutt was probably ignoring your old cache. Try removing the cache
> > > files and then opening your mailbox twice.
> > And:
> > 01:58 <brendan> 351220 I suspect is simply the header cache not being used.
> > the cache probably needs to be removed by hand...
> > 05:10 <dato> brendan: submitter of 351220 is generally clued, but I'll check
> > with him that the cache is really being used.
> Yes, the header cache is used. I checked again... with 1.5.11-5,
> opening a folder which contains 1800 mails the first time takes 25
> seconds, when opening the second time it takes 2 seconds.
> After upgrading to 1.5.11+cvs20060126-1, opening the same folder the
> first time takes 24 seconds, and 12 seconds when opening the folder
> the second time.
> I tested this on three different machines (2x unstable, 1x sarge with
> mutt backports).
All against the same IMAP server? Can you try against some other, or
with maildirs in the local filesystem? I've done tests with 4 Mutt
binaries (1.5.11-5 and 1.5.11+cvs20060126-1, both with libdb and
gdbm), and I see no important differences among them (no variation
between versions; wrt database backend, same as always: gdbm a biiit
slower when creating the db, a biiit faster when reading it). I've
tried it with [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bincimap) with a folder of 1400
messages, and with a local maildir with 10200 messages.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Pasión Vega - Lejos de Lisboa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
