Hi Vincent, I spent a while trying to reproduce this (using my old LaTeX source as it existed when I submitted this bug) -- but I can't figure out exactly what was happening or how to reproduce it, even when using the original version of latex-make. This was happening on a huge file and it's probably specific to how pages get laid out.
However, looking at the code, I do think both of the original problems still hold true: - If you look at LU_rebuild_bibtopic_undefined_references, it's grepping through the wrong log file. No other rule looks like that, and the variable $(MASTER_$(LU_REC_MASTER)) doesn't even exist. The original patch I included makes it look through the same log file as all the other rules. - bibtopic_undefined_references looks for the message "There were undefined references". That message isn't only for bibtopic, but could show up with just basic use of \label and \ref, and so I think bibtopic_undefined_references should be added to the default REBUILD_RULES. But this one is less important (since the user is expected to porentially override REBUILD_RULES anyway) Jim Vincent Danjean wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to be so long to come back to this bug. I do not observe > the same behavior on my LaTeX files. Can you tell me if this bug > is already fixed. Or can you give me the sources that lead to > this bug (you can obfuscate/remove all text if you want)? > > Regards, and sorry again to forget to handle this bug. > Vincent > > Le 16/04/2013 à 21:23, Jim Paris a écrit : > > Package: latex-make > > Version: 2.1.18-2 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch > > > > LaTeX.mk was failing to rebuild my document when there were still > > undefined references. I needed to make two changes: > > > > 1) The default REBUILD_RULES doesn't include > > "bibtopic_undefined_references" (which is strangely named anyway, > > because I'm not using bibtopic). I needed to set: > > REBUILD_RULES=latex texdepends bibtopic_undefined_references > > in my Makefile. > > > > 2) The LU_rebuild_bibtopic_undefined_references rule seems broken. > > I fixed it with the patch below. > > > > -jim > > > > --- LaTeX.mk.orig 2013-04-16 15:17:52.538820616 -0400 > > +++ LaTeX.mk 2013-04-16 15:18:38.680520237 -0400 > > @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ > > LU_rebuild_bibtopic_undefined_references: > > $(call lu-rebuild-head) > > $(COMMON_HIDE)if grep -sq 'There were undefined references'\ > > - "$(MASTER_$(LU_REC_MASTER)).log" ; then \ > > + "$(LU_REC_LOGFILE)" ; then \ > > $(call lu-rebuild-needed,"$@: new run needed") \ > > fi > > > > -- System Information: > > Debian Release: 6.0.6 > > APT prefers stable > > APT policy: (200, 'stable'), (80, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, > > 'experimental') > > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > > Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > > > Versions of packages latex-make depends on: > > ii dpkg 1.16.8 > > ii ghostscript 8.71~dfsg2-10 > > ii make 3.81-8.1 > > ii python 2.7.2-9 > > ii tex-common 3.15 > > ii transfig 1:3.2.5.c-1 > > > > Versions of packages latex-make recommends: > > ii inkscape 0.48.3.1-1.3 > > ii texlive-latex-extra 2012.20120611-2 > > ii texlive-latex-recommended 2012.20120611-5 > > > > latex-make suggests no packages. > > > > -- no debconf information > > > > > -- > Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org > GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA > Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html > APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
