Andrew Shadura: > On 26/02/17 08:32, Helmut Grohne wrote: >> Looking at the experimental binary package however, I note that I fail >> to find a diversion for pkg-config-dpkghook and its hook-config. Thus >> the experimental package would actually need a conflicts relation now. > >> So I consider the experimental package rc buggy and propose either >> renaming the conflicting files or adding a conflicts relation. Since >> neither /usr/share/pkg-config-crosswrapper nor >> /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/pkg-config-hook-config are part of the pkg-config >> API, I'd just rename both to avoid the need for diversions here. Even >> when using conflicts, conffiles will not go away and reusing the >> hook-config file from pkg-config can result in a mess of its own. So I >> actually recommend doing the renaming (s/pkg-config/pkgconf/) in any >> case (even when adding conflicts). If you end up using conflicts, all >> the other diversions can go away as well. > > Right, I thought that apt replacing one package by the other is a > sufficient condition to consider the package correct. > > Niels, Helmut, how about the diff I attached? >
Ok with me. ~Niels
