at bottom :-
On 08/02/2017, shirish शिरीष <shirisha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> in-line :-
>
> On 08/02/2017, A Mennucc <deb...@mennucc1.debian.net> wrote:
>> hi
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> Il 07/02/2017 15:34, shirish शिरीष ha scritto:
>>> the answer to both is no, the first resulted in http entries .
>>> The second command didn't have any result which means no proxies.
>> that's weird.. that code path should never be used in this case...
>>>> May you also check this patch ..
>>> I'll get back to you on this, gimme some time.
>> I have put a patched version in http://debdelta.debian.net/d0.59.tar.gz
>>
>> a.
>>
>
> Umm... Is this anyway better than the one I have now
>
> ─[$] apt-cache policy debdelta debdelta-doc
>
> [16:52:29]
> debdelta:
> Installed: 0.58exp+nmu1
> Candidate: 0.58exp+nmu1
> Version table:
> *** 0.58exp+nmu1 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 0.58exp 1
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64
> Packages
> 0.56 600
> 600 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
> debdelta-doc:
> Installed: 0.58exp+nmu1
> Candidate: 0.58exp+nmu1
> Version table:
> *** 0.58exp+nmu1 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 0.58exp 1
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64
> Packages
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian experimental/main i386
> Packages
> 0.56 600
> 600 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
> 600 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
> 1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages
>
>
> /usr/share/doc/debdelta $ zless changelog.gz
>
> debdelta (0.58exp+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Apply rename mismatched uri variable from #708022
>
> -- shirish <shirish@debian> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 20:33:21 +0530
>
>
> lintian just complains about my e-mail address being not good
>
> sha1sum of both -
>
> └─[$] sha1sum debdelta_0.58exp+nmu1_amd64.deb
>
> [16:58:56]
> ae560aa9878ff83c7267f261dab55156c6ee168d debdelta_0.58exp+nmu1_amd64.deb
>
> [$] sha1sum debdelta-doc_0.58exp+nmu1_all.deb
> [17:00:02]
> 1ad96af61c34a63c985a8ce0901cece0622bcdb4 debdelta-doc_0.58exp+nmu1_all.deb
>
> It does feel ok. I did do a debdelta-upgrade run sometime back and it
> worked.
>
> I cannot say the 'uri' issue is gone or not as that happens intermittently.
>
> If you still feel I should the patched build packages that you have
> built, will jump to that, no issues.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
> My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
> http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
> EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
>
I got hit again today with the same bug -
debdelta-upgrade : timed out15_232-18_amd64.debdelta ; P 12%
libreoffice-common_1%3a5.2.5-2_all.deb
[1] 26404 segmentation fault (core dumped) sudo debdelta-upgrade
and then trying it again -
└─[$] sudo debdelta-upgrade
debdelta-upgrade : ''d of gir1.2-lokdocview-0.1...
Does ths info. help you in any way ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
