Oops, sorry, I missed the important point you made: On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:52:12PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > which also doesnn't modify j (unless you intended that j=nsize).
No, you are right, j probably should not be modified. If I understand the code correctly, setting j (and therefore js.j_lastj) to nsize does not really cause a problem, but is suboptimal, as it would immediately trigger a reallocation of the jobs array. Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
