severity 854965 normal thanks Le 12/02/2017 à 20:34, Robert Luberda a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru pisze: >> Why do you consider that as serious? > The Debian Policy in section 3.5 says "Every package must specify the > dependency information about other packages that are required for the > first to work correctly." It can be that the sentence is more about > depending on needed packages rather than about not depending on > unnecessary ones, but honestly I would still consider too wide > dependencies as a serious bug. However feel free lower the severity if > you disagree. yeah, I just did. This doesn't cause any severe issues.
> Anyway in my opinion the 64-bit libraries are not needed for clang to > work correctly on i386. I can see that the libclang-common-dev package > started providing some x86_64 libs, and dpkg-shlibdeps added dependences > that were necessary for those libs; but I am really in doubt if clang > will ever use those libs in normal usage, so maybe there is some > packaging error somewhere? However if this was intentional for any > reason, it would be great if you could consider making the dev package > Multi-Arch:same instead to get rid of those strange 64-bit libs dependences. I think it was introduced in 3.9-5 to fix bug #841923. I guess 3.9 is also impacted Don't hesitate to propose a patch to implement Multi-Arch:same. I won't have the time to implement it soon. S
