On 21 Jan 2017, at 2:10 PM, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:41:23 AM AEDT TFAUCK wrote: >> Initially I thought that maintainers of etcd 2.0 which are also >> maintainers for packages relative to go were going to do it, but I may >> be wrong there. > > I'm not sure what are you trying to say... > Maintainers (upstream developers) of Etcd are not maintainers of Debian > package... > > >> I can work with the package upgrade and submit the debdiff if that's the >> idea ? > > Whatever you can do to help is welcome. I suggest to start working on > dependency packages -- that's where usual >90% of effort will be spent...
I suddenly have a need for etcd3 and have done a quick run through building the dependencies. There are only a half dozen new ones and they all build without very much tweaking. I think an upgrade of grpclog is required and then it should be good. Will keep working on it tomorrow. Tim.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail