On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:57:18 -0600 Don Armstrong wrote:

[...]
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I mean: too many data gets similar to the absence of data.
> > It often says "NO release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were
> > opened." and many previous changes have already vanished from the
> > page.
> 
> Ah; that's a legitimate feature request. It should probably keep track
> of bugs which had been opened/closed in the previous 24H (or perhaps
> longer) time period.

Thanks for converting my considerations into a feature request.
I think 24 hours is fine, with a clear distinction among the various
updates.
Something like:


  Recent changes

  Mon Feb 6 20:00:00 UTC 2017

  3 release-critical bugs were closed and 2 were opened.

  Closed:

  pkg1: #xxxxxx, #yyyyyy
  pkg2: #zzzzzz

  Opened:

  pkg3: #aaaaaa, #bbbbbb

  Mon Feb 6 19:00:00 UTC 2017

  NO release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were opened.

  Mon Feb 6 18:00:00 UTC 2017

  1 release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were opened.

  Closed:

  pkg4: #cccccc

  Mon Feb 6 17:00:00 UTC 2017

  [...]


and so forth...


Or maybe even better:


  Recent changes

  3 release-critical bugs were closed and 2 were opened.

  Closed:

  pkg1: #xxxxxx, #yyyyyy
  pkg2: #zzzzzz

  Opened:

  pkg3: #aaaaaa, #bbbbbb

  Previous changes

  Mon Feb 6 19:00:00 UTC 2017

  Mon Feb 6 18:00:00 UTC 2017

  Mon Feb 6 17:00:00 UTC 2017

  [...]


where each date is a link to a dedicated page where
the corresponding changes are listed (only the latest 23 such pages
are retained).


I hope this feature may be implemented soon.
Thank you very much for your time and patience!


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpTsOJUD8EH5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to