Hi all, Am 04.02.2017 um 20:42 schrieb Aaro Koskinen: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Joachim Falk wrote: >> I have investigated this some more. I assume you used the code from >> https://github.com/zohead/fbvnc for fbvnc. > > Yes, with some local fixes. > >> With this code, I can reproduce the bug. I assume the problem is that fbvnc >> does not support a vncviewer local cursor and Xtigervnc needs local cursor >> handling by the VNC client application. I do not know if this is a regression >> in Xtigervnc. > > I don't think RFB 3.3 clients need to implement any local cursor support. I also don't think so. Moreover, it does work for the TigerVNC backport to debian jessie.
============ Am 04.02.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Joachim Falk: =============== Hi all, Am 09.01.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Joachim Falk: > Hi all, > > Am 09.01.2017 um 16:33 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko: >> >> On Sat, 07 Jan 2017, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> >>> Hi all TigerVNC maintainers >> >>> I just want you to know that I have now uploaded a vnc4 and tightvnc >>> source package that are just transitional packages to tigervnc. >> >>> So now there is no going back. >> >> Linus bless us all! thank you Ola. That is a pity that we don't have >> an easy backport of tigervnc for e.g. jessie ATM -- I can't really give >> it a "real life" testing since most of the servers I am using VNC on run >> on debian stable > I might take a look at a backport. I just finished the backport to jessie. Am 30.01.2017 um 03:45 schrieb Martin Dorey: > > Sorry to make such a meal of such a trivial nugget, but I want to convey how > little I understand. > Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to try to similarly brutalize the old > Jessie packaging of tigervnc 1.6.0, > if I still have it lying around, to see if I can get back in to :0 on the > server that I actually care about... Maybe try the backport I have mirrored my debs to https://xamane.jfalk.de/dists/homebrew-jessie Regards, Joachim Falk ========================================================================= So, it seems to be a regression with the combination of Xorg 1.19 in stretch and the VNC patch to it. Ola, where did you get this patch? If I remember correctly, Xorg 1.19 is not officially supported for TigerVNC 1.7. > What's interesting that server is chaging/drawing the cursor shape properly > e.g. when moving the mouse over uxterm or doing other actions, it's just that > the location is frozen. > >>> This works fine with tightvnc on both arm64 and armhf using older Debian >>> rootfs. But unfortunately that does not seem to be an option anymore. >> However, I can not even get this working with tightvncserver under stretch. >> Here the connection from fbvnc gets a garbled image from the Xtightvnc >> server. Maybe you can post the changes to fbvnc somewhere, so that we test with the same code? > I have it working fine. > > A. > Regards, Joachim Falk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
