Thanks Sent from a phone
Den 4 feb 2017 17:51 skrev "Adrian Bunk" <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:32:36AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 01:45 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > > > > > I'd like you to remove some binary packages from testing as it > > > prevents tigervnc from entering > > > testing. > > > > This bug report seems confused. The FTP team don't remove packages from > > testing, and the only thing the Release team remove from testing is > > entire source packages, not individual binary packages. > > > > In general, if outdated binary packages are blocking migration, then > > they need removing _from unstable_. > > > > However: > > > > > Please remove: > > > tigervnc-common > > > tigervnc-scraping-server > > > tigervnc-standalone-server > > > tigervnc-viewer > > > tigervnc-xorg-extension > > > from armel and armhf. > > > > tigervnc-common | 1.7.0+dfsg-5 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, > armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > tigervnc-viewer | 1.7.0+dfsg-5 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, > armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > > > That doesn't look like the package is FTBFS on armel or armhf. > > The FTBFS on armel and armhf was in -4: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tigervnc&arch=armel > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tigervnc&arch=armhf > > This was due to #853793 (fixed in dpkg 1.18.22). > > > Regards, > > > > Adam > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > >
