On 2017-02-01 22:18:07 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Currently I am rebuilding testing with the same set of package against > libssl-dev provided by libssl1.0-dev. After that I retry the failed > packages above where I am not sure why they failed (mostly I suspect the > parallel) case. > Do you want a complete testing rebuild or another set of packages?
it is at [0] and a retry of all failed with -j1 at [1]. I had just a quick look: - perl fails in the test suite but that ist "okay". It builds against 1.0 but it B-D are built against 1.1 and perl exposes the openssl ABI as-is. So rebuilding it in the right order should avoid it. - a few packages like cfengine3, ldns, freelan, duo-unix, dogecoin, dsniff and cyrus-sasl2 seem like they compile with 1.1 but do not compile against 1.0 since they expect 1.1 functions to be around. There may be more, I had a quick look. The build succeeded with 1.1 earlier. - some of globus-* and lcmaps-* packages fail and I am not sure if they can't deal with 1.0 anymore or if it is similar to perl where everything has to be moved to 1.0 in the right order. [0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0/ [1] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0-retry/ > > Cheers, > > Julien Sebastian
