Package: alsa-utils Version: 1.1.3-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer,
since alsa-utils 1.1.3 alsa-utils ships a man page for the alsaucm utility program. It would be great if you can ship it in the debian package. The unix man page is built from a reStructuredText source file using the rst2man program which in Debian can be found in python-docutils or python3-docutils; so build-depending on either one of these should be enough to make the build system generate alsaucm.1. If you are building from tarballs and alsaucm.rst is missing there, this has been fixed after 1.1.3, see: http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-utils.git;a=commitdiff;h=c6bdde171e1532f7b37333a5a746b6e662f12c53 If this is the case tell if you want me to send a patch which adds alsucm.rst at packaging time, until the next stable tarball. Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages alsa-utils depends on: ii dialog 1.3-20160828-2 ii kmod 23-2 ii libasound2 1.1.3-1 ii libc6 2.24-9 ii libfftw3-single3 3.3.5-3 ii libncursesw5 6.0+20161126-1 ii libsamplerate0 0.1.8-8 ii libtinfo5 6.0+20161126-1 ii lsb-base 9.20161125 ii whiptail 0.52.19-1 alsa-utils recommends no packages. alsa-utils suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
