Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#852226: dgit: Want `dgit setup-maint-merge`"):
> Package: dgit
> Version: 3.6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> A simple helper which would
This is a fine idea, but FYI I don't intend to work on it.
> I think this should be a dgit subcommand because the -maint-merge
> workflow shouldn't be used without dgit (since there should be a
> canonical, non-rewinding git history that is updated with every upload).
I agree that it should be in the dgit package, but my initial feeling
is that it shouldn't be a dgit subcommand. I don't want dgit proper
to contain nontrivial amounts of logic for specific workflows.
Is it too confusing if
dgit foo-bar
and
dgit-foo-bar
are separate namespaces ?
Or maybe it could be called git-setup-dgit-maint-merge.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
