[replying separately as this is tangential]

Hello Daniel,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:52:09PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ian Jackson wrote on Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 00:21:56 +0000:
> > Let me quote yur preferred wording from your patch.  (I find it easier
> > to deal with this inline as prose than as an attachment.  And I'd like
> > Daniel's opinion, as someone who has to deal with "not their own"
> > packages, before concluding that we have the wording right.)
> 
> I think in my case, the root problem was that the assumptions of
> dgit-maint-merge(7) did not hold: I was using the source package
> not as an "output format" but as a the primary source.

The suggested text for debian/source/patch-header is meant to avoid this
misunderstanding.  Do you have any suggestions for improving that text?

Thanks!

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to