Hi Fred, On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:30 +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Ghislain. > > do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies > already in Debian ?
First of, the upstream changelog did not mention any breakage, only fixes and new features (support for qtmultimedia). Upstream has had a good track record at keeping these in check so far. > python-qtpy > Reverse Depends: > python-spyder > python-ginga > python-qtawesome > python-glue Both qtpy 1.1.2 and qtpy 1.2.0 works with spyder 3.0.2 (tested in a venv). Since qtpy was designed for spyder in the first place, it is probably the best possible test we have in hand. In addition, I have checked pyzo and git-cola. Both works fine with qtpy 1.1.2 and 1.2.0. > We are close from the freeze and I do not want to end up with a bunch of > autorm packages due to this kind of upload. Based on my initial testing, I am confident this is safe. I'd still have a week to fix things if disaster strikes, but I'd be really suprised. > BUT if you can show that there is no problem I am ok to sponsorize this > package. Your call. Ghis
