Package: git-buildpackage Version: 0.8.8 Severity: important Hi,
It seems like `gbp buildpackage` doesn't run a `dpkg-source --before-build` before doing things (like `dpkg-buildpackage` does). This results in weird behavior, and possibly harmful behavior. Here is an example: micah@muck:diceware-debian3$ gbp buildpackage --git-pristine-tar --git-upstream-tag='v%(version)s' --git-debian-branch=debian dh clean --with python2 --buildsystem=python_distutils dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=python_distutils dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=python_distutils python setup.py clean -a running clean 'build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it 'build/scripts-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it find . -name \*.pyc -exec rm {} \+ dh_clean -O--buildsystem=python_distutils gbp:error: You have uncommitted changes in your source tree: gbp:error: On branch debian Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/debian'. Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) .eggs/ nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track) gbp:error: Use --git-ignore-new to ignore. micah@muck:diceware-debian3$ As you can see, I tried to build and the build failed because of that odd .eggs/ directory appearing. I chased this around for some time, and eventually I tried to build with dpkg-buildpackage: micah@muck:diceware-debian141$ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package diceware dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.9.1-1 dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Andre Bianchi <dr...@riseup.net> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build diceware-debian dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: python-pytest-runner dpkg-buildpackage: warning: build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.) Hello! I'm missing a build-dependency! Why didn't `gbp buildpackage` tell me that in the first place? If `gbp buildpackage` is willing to go ahead with running a build before checking build-dependencies, then it is possible to silently produce bad packages if they behave differently if some dependency is missing! thanks, micah -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages git-buildpackage depends on: ii devscripts 2.16.13 ii git 1:2.11.0-2 ii man-db 2.7.6.1-2 ii python-dateutil 2.5.3-2 ii python-pkg-resources 32.0.0-1 ii python-six 1.10.0-3 pn python:any <none> Versions of packages git-buildpackage recommends: ii cowbuilder 0.82 ii pbuilder 0.227 ii pristine-tar 1.37 ii python-requests 2.12.4-1 ii sbuild 0.73.0-1 Versions of packages git-buildpackage suggests: ii python-notify 0.1.1-4 ii sudo 1.8.19-1 ii unzip 6.0-21 -- no debconf information