On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 9:32:18 PM AEDT Felipe Sateler wrote: > Moving > the removal to after the debhelper block should fix this as well.
Would that be an ugly workaround for bug in the other package? > Upon package remove but not purge, dh_systemd will mask the unit so > that upon the next boot you do not get boot failures because the > program is no longer installed. I still do not understand how/why is that a problem in gfarm (but not in other packages) and why gfarm needs workaround. It still looks like a bug in debhelper. Could you please elaborate why you've reassigned this bug back to gfarm? Thanks. -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Good luck happens when preparedness meets opportunity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
