Hello Peter, On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:59PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +0000, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Oh, and, of course, if people feel that a collab-maint commit does not > > > really count as a team upload (but isn't this the purpose of > > > collab-maint?), > > > I can send another debdiff, formatted as a real NMU, and then commit that. > > > > A team upload is when you are a member of a team that is in the > > Maintainer: field for a package. There is no team in libtorrent's > > Maintainer: field. So this cannot be a team upload. > > Well, yeah, I know that, but I figured that collab-maint might be a bit > different; I guess my impression was a bit wrong :) I guess we need > a "please feel free to commit and upload anything reasonable" flag... > but let's not rehash the latest d-project discussion again :)
Right. collab-maint does not have very clear conventions.
> > It would be great if you could prepare a debdiff for a standard NMU.
>
> Debdiff attached; Markus, take your pick between this one and the last one.
Quick comment: it's conventional to write simply
* Non-maintainer upload.
for the first changelog line.
It's best to stick to conventions like this for the sake of
scripts/etc. processing changelogs.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
