Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo Hi Rouven-Matthias,
Rouven-Matthias Müller wrote: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.6.11-1+b1 […] > the debian security update for apt dated of 2016.12.13 > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > invoke apt-get or aptitude at bash > > * What was the outcome of this action? > > aptitude: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu > /libapt-pkg.so.4.12: invalid ELF header > > apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu > /libapt-pkg.so.4.12: invalid ELF header Hrm. Several things don't fit here: a) I can't reproduce this, neither with aptitude nor with apt-get. b) If aptitude and apt-get are affected it's likely an issue in the package apt and not aptitude. (Easily fixable by reassigning. But let's wait with that…) c) This smells a lot like https://bugs.debian.org/848798 in the package binutils. But then again, that issue is only present in unstable and not stable while you reported that bug report from a stable/jessie release as it seems Any chance that there was a stable/unstable mixup when writing the bug report? If not: Are there any traces of a file system corruption (e.g. in the output of dmesg or so)? What does "debsums -c apt libapt-inst1.5 libapt-pkg4.12" or "dpkg --verify apt libapt-inst1.5 libapt-pkg4.12" say? Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
