source: python-jsbeautifier version: 1.6.4-3 Dear maintainer,
common way to package python application that also ship a module would
be to put the /usr/bin/foo in a 'foo' binary, and the python module
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/foo in a 'python-foo' binary. I
believe you're also getting lintian tags for this, don't you?
Also, considering that python2 is (slowly) coming to its end you should
consider building the python3 module instead of the python2 one (or
together).
I suggest you to consider doing the first one asap so that package don't
start relying on the /usr/bin/foo to be in a python-foo package (bear in
mind that this is going to break anyway when python2 will be removed
from the archive eventually, so way better to do it now).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
