On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:14:36PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:38:38AM +0100, dani wrote: > > 2016-12-05 8:41 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Henrion wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > } >> upcoming hobby projects will be my first encounter with JTAG. > > >> > > >> I want to do that with a recent version of urjtag in Debian. > > > > > > We should make a release at some point, 0.10 is way too old. > > > > A new release with what's currently in snapshots would be great. > > > > It is urjtag_0.10+r2052 that I'm packaging. >
Packaging is done, uploaded into experimental. wget http://stappers.it/do303/debian/experimental/main/amd64/urjtag.deb the sha256sum should match the one at https://tracker.debian.org/news/823692 which is 5aef7aad8a14e5cb97600c3a82caf982d36a27feaa26376a7b0614999ae8ae15 Now I go to test with hardware. All things will be new to me: * to concept "JTAG" * JTAG adaptor * electronics board with a JTAG connector * cable between board and adaptor * the urjtag software So those who test / use the new version in Debian please report your milage. It are message like urjtag 0.10+r2052 from Debian works fine for me with cable ... and PCB. It would be nice if 848...@bugs.debian.org stays in the loop. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
