On 2016-12-17 20:38:43 [+0200], Niko Tyni wrote: > > > For reference, here's a list of lib.*-perl packages depending on > > > libssl1.*. > > As of unstable, there should be nothing perl related depending on libssl1.0. > > If there is then please let me know because it probably might be good to > > port it to 1.1. > > I see three here: > > # grep-dctrl -P perl > /var/lib/apt/lists/localhost:3142_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages|grep-dctrl > -n -sPackage -FDepends libssl1.0 > liblasso-perl lasso, does not look like perl. A binNMU worked on 2016-08-26.
> libnet-ldns-perl and this binNMUed just fine. Missed that because it does not depend on libssl-dev. Two binNMUs here and we should be good here… > libsnmp-perl and this looks problematic. This is from net-snmp. There is another RC bug asking to stay with 1.0 due to libssh. The .so files within libsnmp-perl are linked against libcrypto.so.1.0.2. I can't find a single symbol that is exported by libcrypto and required by any of the .so files within libsnmp-perl. So I *think* there is no need for the perl package to link against libcrypto and we can ignore this one. Given that I think we could leave net-snmp with 1.0 for Stretch. Sebastian
