Hi,
Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> I think there are a few options:
>
> 1. Rename the manpage in one of the packages
> 3. Move one of the manpages to another section
Any suggestions for how to rename them? Do we already have a manpage
section like e.g. "5sysv"?
> 2. Remove the manpage from one of the packages
This might make sense if one version includes nearly everything from
the other version (plus additional parts).
I don't know the difference, but I could imagine that the manpages'
tmpfs.5 has some more systemd-specific information. So if the
sysvinit-specific parts in tmpfs.5 are not gone (or soon to be
removed), then we could switch to the version from manpages.
> 4. Use the Debian alternatives system
> (don't know if this would work well)
I think that's overkill for this case, but definitely an option.
> 5. Add Breaks/Conflicts to the packages
> (does not seem to be a desirable solution)
Yes, I agree that this is not desirable.
I think there is at least one more option:
6. Let one package divert away the other package's version (like
iceweasel did with firefox for quite a while).
If e.g. initscripts is no more needed in a (future?) default
installation and manpages' tmpfs.5 covers more systemd-specific
stuff while (at some point) sysvinit-specific stuff can only be
found in sysvinit's tmpfs.5, initscripts could divert manpages'
tmpfs.5 away, so that sysvinit users get the information relevant
for them and all others get the default, which probably covers also
systemd-specific stuff.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
