Package: libnetxx-dev
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer upstream

Dear Maintainer,

I cross compile with netxx, and then discovered miner bug.
The symbolic link between libNetxx.so and libNetxx.so.1 are not in the same 
package as libNetxx.so.1


   * What led up to the situation?
I discovered it because I wanted to use the Netxx in both on Armhf and on my 
AMD64 build machine and libnetxx-dev packages for these mutually exclusive and 
I had to be swapped libnetxx-dev package depending on what I wanted to build.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?

I fix this problem for myself, have created the symbolic link and everything 
works.
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libNetxx.so -> libNetxx.so.1

I tried to do a patch, looking at netxx-0.3.2 code but was not wise on the mkmf 
file.
libnetxx-dev and libnetxx1 is created in the same package, but I can not 
understand where they mixed together.
Sorry, have not create a debian package before.


A mini issue in this, why dose not apt-get allow that I have libnetxx-dev:armhf 
and libnetxx-dev:amd64 installed at the same time?
It hase unique paths to the lib, etc. I can not see that there would be a 
problem.


Best regarde Rickard


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Reply via email to