> Just to add more information to the bug report: the Gentoo developer who > tried to get libiccjpeg into lcms also tried (and apparently failed) to > get it into libjpeg-turbo: > https://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/mailman/message/30387709/ > > Thomas
Hi Michael, I am currently discussing a possible inclusion of iccjpeg into libjpeg-turbo.[1] He seems to be willing to include it, subject to some conditions. The biggest hurdle to me seems to be a renaming of the functions. You know your upstreams better than I do - how likely is it that they would drop their specific copy of iccjpeg, use libjepg-turbo and adapt their code for the new API? Thomas