> Just to add more information to the bug report: the Gentoo developer who
> tried to get libiccjpeg into lcms also tried (and apparently failed) to
> get it into libjpeg-turbo:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/mailman/message/30387709/
> 
>       Thomas

Hi Michael, 
I am currently discussing a possible inclusion of iccjpeg into
libjpeg-turbo.[1] He seems to be willing to include it, subject to some
conditions. The biggest hurdle to me seems to be a renaming of the
functions. You know your upstreams better than I do - how likely is it
that they would drop their specific copy of iccjpeg, use libjepg-turbo
and adapt their code for the new API?

        Thomas

Reply via email to