This one time, at band camp, Gabor HALASZ said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > > > >Point me to it. I'm happy to consider patches or new ideas. I've about > >bent this script as far as it will bend, and I'd be happy to go for > >something simpler, but I can't seem to think of a new way to come at > >the problem that solves the 3 problems above in a more elegant way. > > Hi! I think, the easiest way to solve this problem, make a debconf > questions about the style of initializaton, and everybody will decide, > what they want.
The problem with this suggestion is that the packaging guides and references explicitly say not to use debconf if there is a sane default. There is definitely a sane default for hdparm - do nothing. That is exactly what is done on install. I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be argumentative, but what exactly is the hardship involved with setting a symlink? Especially as how to do it is laid out for you in a README? If the documentation is unclear, I am happy to try and fix it with your assistance. If you feel it is just inelegant, then I am afraid I agree, but see no better way. Take care, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
