Control: tags 845504 pending patch

Hi,

On 29-11-16 20:55, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> The dependency on linker package could be fixed easily as you said.

But how should we do this in reality?
Depends:  binutils | binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu |
binutils-alpha-linux-gnu | .... etc?

> For the /etc/fpc.cfg, this could be solved by adding liens like:
> 
> # path to the gcclib
> 
> #ifdef cpui386
> 
> -Fl/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/32
> 
> #endif
> 
> #ifdef cpux86_64
> 
> -Fl/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6
> 
> #endif

Is this instead of what we now add in fp-compiler.postinst? (By the way,
shouldn't we be using ucf for that there?)

> The file itself is installed by an arch independent package polled by
> all fp-compiler packages. This way we have a platform config file

You mean arch-dependent, right? fp-compiler-3.0.0 is now creating and
installing that. Should we revise this then?

> Instead of writing a tool to hack all this, I'd propose you submit
> patches and join the maintain team.

Yes, you are welcome.

@Ben, do you think the multi-arch hinter on the tracker is correct
(action needed section of: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fpc)

Paul
PS: I'll upload soon for the other bug and stuff that is already
pending. Would be nice if we could get further on this bug as well.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to